An Act concerning the regulation of Kratom
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to regulate the sale and use of Kratom, a plant containing alkaloids similar to opioids, within Massachusetts. It seeks to establish rules and guidelines for its distribution, labeling, and potential health impacts. The legislation intends to provide consumer protection and address concerns related to Kratom’s potential for misuse and dependence. Currently, Kratom is not regulated in Massachusetts, and this bill seeks to change that.
Key provisions
- Requires registration and licensing for Kratom businesses.
- Mandates specific labeling requirements for Kratom products.
- Limits the amount of Kratom that can be purchased at one time.
- Prohibits Kratom sales to minors.
- Establishes guidelines for Kratom product potency and testing.
- Creates a registry of Kratom vendors and consumers.
- Outlines restrictions on Kratom advertising and marketing.
- Allows for the enforcement of regulations through fines and penalties.
Who is affected
- Kratom retailers and distributors
- Consumers of Kratom
- Healthcare providers
- The Massachusetts Department of Public Health
- The general public
Notable changes
- Establishes a regulatory framework for Kratom, which currently lacks specific rules in Massachusetts.
- Addresses concerns about potential public health risks associated with Kratom use.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
5 on record
Primary sponsor
Jacob R. Oliveira
Cosponsors
Jacob R. Oliveira
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours