An Act relative to the training, assessment, and assignment of qualified school interpreters in educational settings
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to establish standards for training, assessment, and the assignment of qualified school interpreters in Massachusetts public schools. It seeks to ensure that students who rely on interpreters receive consistent and effective support within the educational system. The legislation intends to improve the quality of interpretation services provided to students and their families.
Key provisions
- Requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to develop guidelines for school interpreters.
- Establishes standards for interpreter training and assessment.
- Specifies procedures for assigning interpreters to students who require interpretation services.
- Addresses the qualifications and responsibilities of school interpreters.
- Mandates the Department of Education to monitor and evaluate the implementation of these guidelines.
- Requires the Department to maintain a registry of qualified school interpreters.
- Promotes culturally responsive interpretation practices.
- Ensures interpreters have access to relevant student information.
Who is affected
- Students with limited English proficiency
- Students who are deaf or hard of hearing
- School districts
- School administrators
- School interpreters
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
8 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
James B. Eldridge
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours