An Act relative to Massachusetts home care eligibility
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill seeks to expand eligibility criteria for Massachusetts’s home care program. It aims to broaden the definition of ‘need’ for receiving home care services, potentially allowing more seniors and individuals with disabilities to qualify. The legislation intends to improve access to in-home assistance for those who require it, focusing on a broader range of circumstances beyond solely needing assistance with activities of daily living. It also seeks to align the program with broader goals of supporting independent living and reducing reliance on institutional care.
Key provisions
- Expands the definition of ‘need’ for home care eligibility.
- Broadens the categories of individuals potentially eligible for home care services.
- May include consideration of non-medical needs in determining eligibility.
- Potentially allows for a wider range of services to be covered under the program.
- Aims to improve access to home care for individuals with disabilities.
Who is affected
- Seniors
- Individuals with disabilities
- Caregivers
- Elder Affairs Department
- Healthcare providers
Notable changes
- Potentially broadens the criteria for determining home care eligibility.
- Could lead to an increase in the number of individuals receiving home care services.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Patricia D. Jehlen
Cosponsors
James B. Eldridge
Patricia D. Jehlen
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours