An Act relative to military grade controlled property
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses the regulation of military-grade controlled property in Massachusetts. It aims to clarify and strengthen the state’s authority to manage and control items typically associated with military use, potentially preventing their misuse or diversion within the state. The legislation seeks to ensure consistent enforcement and oversight of these items. The specific details of the regulations are yet to be defined.
Key provisions
- Clarifies the definition of ‘military-grade controlled property’.
- Establishes procedures for the reporting and tracking of such property.
- Addresses the transfer and possession of military-grade controlled property.
- Specifies penalties for violations of the regulations.
- Requires state and local law enforcement to cooperate in enforcing the law.
- Creates a framework for the state to manage and control these items.
- Addresses potential gaps in existing regulations.
Who is affected
- Law enforcement agencies
- Private citizens
- Businesses dealing with potentially regulated items
- Federal agencies operating within Massachusetts
Notable changes
- The bill likely aims to enhance Massachusetts’ ability to regulate military-grade controlled property.
- It may establish new reporting requirements for individuals and businesses.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Michael J. Barrett
Cosponsors
Michael J. Barrett
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours