An Act relative to patient access to information regarding breast reconstructive surgery
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve patient access to information regarding breast reconstructive surgery. It seeks to ensure patients receive comprehensive details about the procedures, potential risks, and expected outcomes before making decisions. The legislation intends to promote transparency and informed consent in this area of healthcare. Ultimately, the goal is to empower patients with the knowledge they need to make well-considered choices about their breast reconstruction options.
Key provisions
- Requires healthcare providers to provide patients with detailed information about breast reconstructive surgery.
- Mandates that this information includes details about potential risks, complications, and expected outcomes.
- Ensures patients receive information about alternative treatment options.
- Promotes informed consent by requiring providers to discuss the information with patients.
- Addresses the need for clear and accessible patient education materials.
Who is affected
- Patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery
- Healthcare providers offering breast reconstructive surgery
- Surgeons
- Plastic Surgeons
- Hospitals and Clinics
Notable changes
- This bill seeks to standardize the information provided to patients regarding breast reconstruction.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
William C. Galvin
Cosponsor
William C. Galvin
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours