An Act regulating certain insurance benefits for elected officials in the town of Blackstone
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to regulate the insurance benefits provided to elected officials in the town of Blackstone, Massachusetts. It was petitioned by residents of Blackstone and subsequently approved by the town’s governing body. The legislation seeks to establish specific rules and regulations concerning these benefits.
Key provisions
- Establishes regulations for insurance benefits for elected officials in Blackstone.
- The bill was approved by the town of Blackstone.
- The legislation was referred to the House Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government.
- The bill was reported favorably by the Senate committee.
- The bill was read second and ordered to a third reading in the Senate.
- The title of the bill was changed.
- The bill was referred to the House Committee on House Steering, Policy and Scheduling.
- The bill was placed in the Orders of the Day for the next session in the House.
Who is affected
- Elected officials in Blackstone, Massachusetts
- Residents of Blackstone, Massachusetts
- Municipalities
- Regional Government
Notable changes
- The bill specifically targets insurance benefits for elected officials in Blackstone.
- It represents a legislative effort to establish oversight and regulation of these benefits within the town.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Michael J. Soter
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours