An Act relative to dangerousness hearings
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill establishes a process for dangerousness hearings in Massachusetts. It outlines procedures for determining if an individual poses a significant risk of harm to themselves or others, and specifies the factors a court must consider when making a dangerousness determination. The hearings are intended to be used in conjunction with sentencing decisions, particularly for individuals convicted of certain offenses. It aims to provide a more structured and consistent approach to assessing and addressing dangerousness.
Key provisions
- Establishes a framework for dangerousness hearings.
- Requires a court to consider specific factors when determining dangerousness.
- Specifies the types of offenses where dangerousness hearings may be utilized.
- Outlines procedures for presenting evidence and cross-examination.
- Addresses the role of mental health evaluations in the process.
- Defines the criteria for a finding of dangerousness.
- Mandates reporting requirements related to dangerousness determinations.
- Clarifies the relationship between dangerousness hearings and sentencing.
Who is affected
- Defendants in criminal cases
- Judges and court personnel
- Mental health professionals
- Victims of crime
- The criminal justice system
Notable changes
- Introduces a formalized process for assessing dangerousness.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours