An Act relative to the equality of wage and recruitment of the Massachusetts State Police
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to ensure equal pay and recruitment opportunities for members of the Massachusetts State Police. It seeks to address potential disparities in compensation and hiring practices within the department. The legislation intends to promote fairness and diversity within the State Police force. It builds upon previous attempts to achieve similar goals.
Key provisions
- Requires the Massachusetts State Police to conduct a comprehensive review of its wage structure.
- Establishes guidelines for equitable pay practices within the department.
- Promotes diversity and inclusion in recruitment efforts.
- Addresses potential disparities in compensation between different roles or experience levels.
- Mandates reporting on recruitment and hiring data to ensure transparency.
Who is affected
- Massachusetts State Police officers
- Potential applicants for positions within the Massachusetts State Police
- The Massachusetts State Police Department
- State taxpayers
Notable changes
- The bill mandates a review of existing wage structures to identify and rectify any inequities.
- It seeks to standardize recruitment practices to ensure a more diverse pool of candidates.
- It builds upon prior legislation addressing similar issues within the State Police.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
6 on record
Primary sponsor
Michael P. Kushmerek
Cosponsors
Michael P. Kushmerek
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours