An Act relative to motor vehicle service contracts
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses motor vehicle service contracts in Massachusetts. It aims to increase transparency and consumer protections related to these contracts, particularly concerning cancellation policies and dispute resolution. The legislation seeks to standardize certain disclosures and ensure consumers understand their rights when purchasing or renewing a service contract. Ultimately, the goal is to provide greater clarity and fairness for vehicle owners.
Key provisions
- Requires service contract providers to clearly disclose cancellation policies.
- Establishes a process for consumers to dispute billing errors.
- Mandates specific disclosures about the scope of coverage.
- Addresses the timing and method of providing cancellation notices.
- Requires service contract providers to provide a written explanation for any denied claims.
- Specifies requirements for the termination of service contracts.
- Addresses the return of premiums upon cancellation.
- Requires service contract providers to maintain records of all contracts and related communications.
Who is affected
- Vehicle Owners
- Motor Vehicle Service Contract Providers
- Consumers
- Financial Services Industry
- Massachusetts Residents
Notable changes
- Standardizes disclosure requirements for service contracts.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Daniel M. Donahue
Cosponsors
Daniel M. Donahue
Jacob R. Oliveira
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours