An Act relative to cueing and supervision in the PCA program
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses the administration and supervision of the Personal Care Attendant (PCA) program in Massachusetts. It focuses on improving cueing and supervision practices within the program, aiming to enhance the quality of care provided to individuals receiving PCA services. The bill seeks to establish clearer guidelines and oversight mechanisms for PCA interactions and support.
Key provisions
- Requires the Division of Medical Assistance to develop and implement standardized cueing procedures for PCA staff.
- Mandates enhanced supervision requirements for PCA staff, including regular monitoring and feedback.
- Establishes protocols for reporting and addressing concerns related to PCA services.
- Focuses on improving communication between PCA staff, clients, and families.
- Addresses the need for training and professional development for PCA staff.
- Requires the Division of Medical Assistance to evaluate the effectiveness of cueing and supervision practices.
- Promotes the use of technology to support cueing and supervision efforts.
Who is affected
- Individuals receiving Personal Care Attendant (PCA) services.
- Personal Care Attendants (PCA) staff.
- Families of individuals receiving PCA services.
- The Division of Medical Assistance.
- The Department of Children and Families
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
James J. O'Day
Cosponsors
James J. O'Day
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours