An Act further defining a quorum of the Worcester Regional Retirement System Board Advisory Council
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies the requirements for establishing a quorum on the Worcester Regional Retirement System Board Advisory Council. It specifically defines the number of members needed to be present for meetings to be valid. The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Rules and subsequently reported favorably by the House Committee on Public Service.
Key provisions
- The bill defines a quorum as a minimum number of members present at a meeting of the Worcester Regional Retirement System Board Advisory Council.
- The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Rules.
- The bill was reported favorably by the House Committee on Public Service.
- The bill was subsequently referred to the House Steering, Policy and Scheduling Committee.
- The bill was read and ordered to a third reading in the House.
- The bill was passed by the House and ordered to be engrossed.
- The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Senate Rules.
Who is affected
- Worcester Regional Retirement System Board Advisory Council
- Members of the Worcester Regional Retirement System Board Advisory Council
- Employees of the Worcester Regional Retirement System
Notable changes
- The bill provides a more precise definition of a quorum for the Worcester Regional Retirement System Board Advisory Council.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
James J. O'Day
Cosponsors
James J. O'Day
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours