An Act relative to eligibility of non-Massachusetts origin veterans for state veteran bonus awards
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill seeks to expand eligibility for Massachusetts’ state veteran bonus awards to include veterans who were not originally residents of the state. Currently, the bonus awards are primarily intended for veterans who served in the Massachusetts National Guard or were residents of Massachusetts at the time of their service. This legislation aims to recognize the service of non-Massachusetts origin veterans who have contributed to the state’s defense.
Key provisions
- Expands eligibility for the state veteran bonus award.
- Allows veterans who did not reside in Massachusetts during their military service to qualify.
- It focuses on broadening the definition of ‘eligible veteran’ for this specific benefit.
- The bill is intended to recognize the service of veterans from other states.
- It aims to ensure that all veterans who served are considered for state benefits.
Who is affected
- Veterans
- Non-Massachusetts origin veterans
- Massachusetts residents
- The Department of Veterans Affairs
Notable changes
- Currently, bonus awards are largely tied to Massachusetts residency or service in the Massachusetts National Guard.
- This bill removes that residency requirement.
- It broadens the scope of veterans eligible for state veteran bonus awards.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
James Arciero
Cosponsors
James Arciero
Raymond L. Mascola
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours