An Act relative to dual diagnosis treatment coverage
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to expand healthcare coverage to include treatment for individuals with both a substance use disorder and a mental health condition, often referred to as ‘dual diagnosis.’ It seeks to ensure that insurance plans in Massachusetts provide adequate coverage for therapies, medications, and other services necessary for managing these complex conditions. The legislation intends to improve access to comprehensive care for those struggling with co-occurring disorders.
Key provisions
- Requires health insurance plans to cover evidence-based treatment for dual diagnosis.
- Expands the definition of ‘dual diagnosis’ to include individuals with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders.
- Promotes access to integrated treatment services.
- Encourages collaboration between mental health and substance use disorder providers.
- Addresses gaps in current coverage for specialized services.
Who is affected
- Individuals with substance use disorders
- Individuals with mental health disorders
- Healthcare providers
- Health insurance companies
- Patients in Massachusetts
Notable changes
- Clarifies coverage requirements for dual diagnosis treatment.
- Potentially expands the scope of services covered by insurance.
- Addresses a gap in care for a significant population.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
James J. O'Day
Cosponsors
James B. Eldridge
James J. O'Day
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours