An Act relative to "Critical Incident Leave"
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill, An Act relative to "Critical Incident Leave," aims to establish guidelines for administrative leave taken by law enforcement officers following an incident where they discharge a firearm. It seeks to provide a more structured and supportive process for officers and their families dealing with such traumatic events. The legislation intends to standardize leave policies and ensure officers receive appropriate support during these challenging times. Ultimately, the goal is to balance the need for accountability with the well-being of officers involved in critical incidents.
Key provisions
- Establishes a process for administrative leave following critical incidents involving firearm discharge.
- Provides for a defined period of ‘critical incident leave’ for affected officers.
- Specifies criteria for determining eligibility for leave.
- Outlines procedures for requesting and approving leave.
- Requires the Department of Public Safety to develop guidelines for critical incident leave.
Who is affected
- Law enforcement officers
- Their families
- The Department of Public Safety
- The Massachusetts State Police
Notable changes
- Creates a specific legal framework for administrative leave in critical incident cases.
- Potentially standardizes leave policies across different law enforcement agencies in Massachusetts.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Jessica Ann Giannino
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours