An Act relative to the defense of private property rights through the prevention of abusive eminent domain takings in the Commonwealth
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to limit the use of eminent domain in Massachusetts by establishing stricter guidelines and protections for private property rights. It seeks to prevent what proponents consider ‘abusive’ takings, ensuring that government entities have a clear and justifiable reason to seize private property. The bill intends to increase transparency and accountability in the eminent domain process, safeguarding property owners from potentially unfair or unnecessary actions.
Key provisions
- Requires a higher standard of necessity for eminent domain takings.
- Mandates greater transparency in the eminent domain process, including public notice and hearings.
- Establishes a judicial review process to challenge eminent domain actions.
- Defines ‘abusive’ eminent domain takings more specifically.
- Requires compensation to be fair and just, considering both the property’s value and any impacts on the property owner.
- Creates a process for property owners to challenge the government’s justification for the taking.
- Addresses the use of eminent domain for economic development projects.
Who is affected
- Property owners in Massachusetts
- Government entities seeking to use eminent domain
- The Judiciary branch
- Developers and economic development organizations
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
7 on record
Primary sponsor
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Cosponsors
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Kimberly N. Ferguson
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours