An Act to enhance access, inclusion, support and equity for military connected families
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve support and resources for military connected families – which includes veterans, active-duty service members, and their families – in Massachusetts. It seeks to increase access to services, promote inclusion, and ensure equitable support for these families. The bill intends to address the unique challenges faced by military families through various initiatives and programs. Ultimately, the goal is to strengthen the well-being of military connected families within the state.
Key provisions
- Conduct a study to assess the needs of military connected families in Massachusetts.
- Improve access to existing support services.
- Promote inclusion and understanding of military connected families within state agencies and programs.
- Ensure equitable access to resources and benefits.
- Support programs addressing the specific challenges faced by military children.
- Facilitate collaboration between state agencies and military organizations.
- Consider the unique needs of military spouses and caregivers.
Who is affected
- Military veterans
- Active-duty military personnel
- Military spouses
- Military children
- Families of military personnel
Notable changes
- The bill mandates a study to identify unmet needs within military connected families.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Thomas M. Stanley
Cosponsors
Thomas M. Stanley
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours