An Act relative to standards for protective headgear for operators or passengers on motorcycles
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to establish standards for protective headgear worn by motorcycle operators and passengers in Massachusetts. It seeks to ensure that the headgear meets specific safety requirements to reduce the risk of head injuries in the event of an accident. The bill was referred to the Transportation committee and subsequently concurred in by the Senate, indicating a path towards potential enactment.
Key provisions
- Establishment of standards for protective headgear.
- Requirements for the headgear to meet specific safety criteria.
- Applies to both motorcycle operators and passengers.
- The bill was referred to the Transportation committee.
- The Senate concurred with the bill.
- A hearing was scheduled to gather information and feedback.
- The hearing was rescheduled multiple times.
- Accompanied a study order, H5143
Who is affected
- Motorcycle operators
- Motorcycle passengers
- Manufacturers of protective headgear
- The Massachusetts Department of Transportation
- Consumers purchasing motorcycle protective headgear
Notable changes
- This bill introduces specific standards for protective headgear, potentially building upon existing laws.
- It references similar legislation from previous sessions (S.2017, S.1943, S.1944), suggesting a history of consideration on this topic.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Kevin Griffin
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours