An Act relative to the uniform procurement act
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill seeks to update and standardize the state’s procurement process, aiming to improve efficiency and transparency in how state agencies purchase goods and services. It intends to align Massachusetts’ procurement practices with best practices and recommendations from other states. The goal is to reduce costs, promote competition among vendors, and ensure fairness in the procurement process. Specifically, the bill focuses on clarifying and streamlining the uniform procurement law.
Key provisions
- Clarifies requirements for competitive bidding processes.
- Addresses the use of sole-source procurement when necessary.
- Establishes guidelines for vendor selection and evaluation.
- Requires agencies to document their procurement decisions.
- Promotes the use of standardized contracts.
- Updates definitions related to procurement terminology.
- Addresses the process for reviewing and appealing procurement decisions.
Who is affected
- State Agencies
- Vendors providing goods and services to state agencies
- The State Procurement Office
- The General Court
- Taxpayers
Notable changes
- The bill aims to modernize the existing uniform procurement law.
- It seeks to incorporate lessons learned from other states' procurement practices.
- No specific exceptions or carve-outs are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
David T. Vieira
Cosponsor
David T. Vieira
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours