An Act relative to deeds excise receipts
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses the collection and distribution of deeds excise receipts in Massachusetts. It seeks to clarify the process by which these receipts are handled and potentially adjust how the revenue is allocated. The bill was introduced as a petition and has undergone several hearings as it moved through the legislative process. The current version of the bill is focused on improving transparency and potentially streamlining the system for managing these receipts.
Key provisions
- Clarifies the process for collecting deeds excise receipts.
- Addresses the distribution of revenue generated from these receipts.
- Requires reporting on the collection and use of deeds excise revenue.
- Establishes a process for reviewing and potentially adjusting the allocation of funds.
- Specifies procedures for handling disputes related to deeds excise assessments.
Who is affected
- Property owners in Massachusetts
- Local governments that receive deeds excise revenue
- The Department of Revenue
- Real estate professionals
Notable changes
- The bill has been subject to multiple hearings and revisions.
- It is part of a series of similar bills introduced over the past several years, suggesting ongoing interest in this area.
- The bill’s progression through the legislature indicates a desire for reform or clarification of the existing system.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Edward R. Philips
Cosponsors
Edward R. Philips
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours