An Act regulating the practice and licensure of veterinary technicians
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to establish regulations and a licensure process for veterinary technicians in Massachusetts. Currently, the practice of veterinary technicians may not be adequately overseen, and this legislation seeks to standardize training, qualifications, and scope of practice to ensure public safety and animal welfare. The bill establishes a framework for regulating the profession and protecting consumers.
Key provisions
- Establishes standards for veterinary technician training and education.
- Creates a licensure process for veterinary technicians.
- Defines the scope of practice for veterinary technicians.
- Outlines responsibilities and duties of licensed veterinary technicians.
- Addresses continuing education requirements for licensed technicians.
- Establishes a registry of licensed veterinary technicians.
- Specifies penalties for violations of the regulations.
- Creates a board to oversee the licensing and regulation of veterinary technicians.
Who is affected
- Veterinary Technicians
- Veterinarians
- Animal Owners
- Animal Welfare Organizations
- The State of Massachusetts
Notable changes
- This bill introduces a formal licensure process for veterinary technicians, which may not currently exist or be clearly defined.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Daniel J. Hunt
Cosponsors
Daniel J. Hunt
Jacob R. Oliveira
James K. Hawkins
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours