An Act relative to uniform real property electronic recordings
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to standardize the process of recording real property electronically in Massachusetts. It seeks to create a uniform system for electronic recordings, ensuring consistency and efficiency across the state. The goal is to streamline real estate transactions and reduce potential errors associated with traditional recording methods. This legislation would establish guidelines and procedures for electronic recordings, promoting clarity and ease of use for property owners and recording officials.
Key provisions
- Establishes standards for electronic real property recordings.
- Requires the Registry of Deeds to accept electronic recordings.
- Defines procedures for verifying and authenticating electronic recordings.
- Addresses data security and privacy concerns related to electronic recordings.
- Creates a process for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of electronic records.
- Specifies requirements for digital signatures and timestamps.
- Mandates training for recording officials on electronic recording procedures.
- Promotes interoperability between different electronic recording systems.
Who is affected
- Real estate owners
- Real estate agents
- Landscriers
- Local registries of deeds
- Title companies
Notable changes
- Creates a uniform system for electronic real property recordings.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Daniel Cahill
Cosponsor
Daniel Cahill
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours