An Act relative to the security of electronic benefit transfer cards
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses the security of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards, which are used to distribute public assistance benefits. It aims to improve the protection of these cards to prevent loss, theft, and misuse, particularly for vulnerable populations like children, families, and individuals with disabilities. The legislation seeks to enhance security measures associated with EBT cards to safeguard benefit recipients and the integrity of the assistance programs they rely on.
Key provisions
- Requires the Department of Transitional Services (DTS) to develop and implement security protocols for EBT cards.
- Establishes procedures for reporting lost or stolen EBT cards.
- Promotes awareness campaigns to educate recipients about EBT card security.
- May explore options for enhanced card design or technology to deter fraud.
- Directs the DTS to assess the effectiveness of current EBT card security measures.
Who is affected
- Individuals receiving public assistance benefits via EBT cards
- Families receiving public assistance benefits
- Children receiving public assistance benefits
- Individuals with disabilities receiving public assistance benefits
- The Department of Transitional Services (DTS)
Notable changes
- The bill focuses specifically on EBT card security, building upon existing data protection efforts.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours