An Act relative to the circular economy
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill, titled ‘An Act relative to the circular economy,’ aims to promote sustainable practices by encouraging the reuse, repair, and recycling of materials and products within Massachusetts. It seeks to reduce waste and resource consumption, aligning with broader environmental goals. The bill intends to foster a more resilient and environmentally conscious economy by prioritizing circularity. It’s currently under consideration by the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Key provisions
- Promotes the development of strategies to reduce waste generation.
- Encourages the reuse, repair, and recycling of materials and products.
- Supports the creation of markets for recycled materials.
- Facilitates collaboration between state agencies and stakeholders.
- Addresses barriers to circular economy initiatives.
- Requires state agencies to assess and incorporate circular economy principles into their operations.
- Establishes a task force to develop recommendations for advancing the circular economy.
- Supports research and development related to circular economy technologies and practices.
Who is affected
- Businesses
- Consumers
- State Agencies
- Environmental Organizations
- Waste Management Companies
Notable changes
- The bill focuses on shifting from a linear ‘take-make-dispose’ model to a circular model.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Kathleen R. LaNatra
Cosponsor
Kathleen R. LaNatra
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours