An Act Authorizing the State Retirement Board to Retire Jamie J. Magarian, a Uniformed Member of the Department of State Police at the Regular Rate of Compensation
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill directs the State Retirement Board to authorize the retirement of Jamie J. Magarian, a uniformed member of the Massachusetts State Police. It allows Magarian to retire at the regular rate of compensation, similar to previous legislation concerning this same retirement request. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Public Service and subsequently reported favorably.
Key provisions
- Authorizes the State Retirement Board to approve Jamie J. Magarian’s retirement.
- Specifies that Magarian’s retirement should occur at the regular rate of compensation.
- Addresses a request for retirement previously submitted.
- The bill was referred to the House Committee on Public Service.
- The bill was reported favorably by the committee.
- The bill was referred to the House Ways and Means Committee.
- The Senate concurred with the House version of the bill.
Who is affected
- Jamie J. Magarian
- Massachusetts State Police
- State Retirement Board
- Department of State Police
- State Employees
Notable changes
- This bill replicates previous legislation regarding Magarian’s retirement.
- It ensures Magarian’s retirement is handled according to standard state retirement practices.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
5 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Jacob R. Oliveira
Steven George Xiarhos
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours