An Act to provide a DNA exception for statute of limitations on sex offenses
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill proposes to allow DNA evidence to be used in sex offense cases even if the statute of limitations has expired. It aims to provide a mechanism for prosecuting individuals who have committed these offenses, even if the time to do so has passed under current law. The bill seeks to balance the rights of victims with the need for justice in cases involving serious crimes. It is similar to previous legislation proposed in Massachusetts.
Key provisions
- Allows the use of DNA evidence in sex offense cases regardless of the statute of limitations.
- Applies to offenses committed before the date of the bill.
- Does not affect existing statutes of limitations for other crimes.
- The bill is intended to address cases where DNA evidence exists but prosecution has been delayed.
- The Judiciary committee will consider the bill's implications.
- Similar legislation has been proposed and studied in the past.
Who is affected
- Victims of sex offenses
- Potential defendants in sex offense cases
- The Judiciary
- Law enforcement agencies
- The legal community
Notable changes
- Expands the use of DNA evidence beyond current statute of limitations.
- Does not alter existing statutes of limitations for other crimes.
- Builds upon previous attempts to address this issue through legislation.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
8 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Christopher Hendricks
Kenneth P. Sweezey
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours