An Act to establish comprehensive rights and career advancement for contingent faculty in public higher education
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve the rights and career opportunities for contingent faculty – such as adjunct and part-time professors – at public colleges and universities in Massachusetts. It seeks to establish standards for compensation and employment, ensuring these educators receive more equitable treatment and have pathways for advancement within the system. The legislation intends to address concerns regarding the status and support provided to contingent faculty within the state’s higher education institutions.
Key provisions
- Establish compensation standards for contingent faculty.
- Create pathways for career advancement for contingent faculty.
- Ensure consistent application of employment standards.
- Address issues related to workload and support services.
- Promote fair treatment and equitable opportunities.
Who is affected
- Contingent faculty
- Public colleges and universities in Massachusetts
- Students at public colleges and universities in Massachusetts
Notable changes
- The bill seeks to standardize employment practices for contingent faculty across the state’s public higher education system.
- It aims to provide greater job security and opportunities for advancement compared to current practices.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
James B. Eldridge
Cosponsors
Danillo A. Sena
James B. Eldridge
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours