An Act protecting children from addictive social media feeds
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to protect children from potentially addictive social media use. It seeks to establish guidelines and regulations around social media platforms to limit their impact on young people's mental and emotional well-being. The legislation intends to address concerns about the addictive nature of these platforms and their potential effects on children's development. It’s part of a broader effort to improve children’s mental health in the digital age.
Key provisions
- Requires social media companies to implement measures to limit the addictive nature of their feeds for children.
- May include restrictions on algorithms designed to maximize user engagement.
- Could establish guidelines for parental controls and monitoring of children’s social media use.
- Potentially mandates disclosures about the potential impact of social media on mental health.
- May require social media companies to provide resources for children struggling with social media addiction.
Who is affected
- Children
- Social media companies
- Parents and guardians
- Mental health advocates
Notable changes
- The bill proposes regulations specifically targeting the addictive design of social media platforms.
- It builds upon existing concerns regarding the impact of social media on children's mental health.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cynthia Stone Creem
Cosponsor
Cynthia Stone Creem
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours