An Act relative to health care quality for children and youth
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve the quality of healthcare provided to children and youth in Massachusetts, particularly those in the custody of the Department of Youth Services. It seeks to establish standards and procedures to ensure these vulnerable populations receive appropriate and comprehensive medical care. The bill intends to address potential gaps in current services and promote better health outcomes for this specific population. It is part of a series of related bills focused on children’s and youth’s well-being.
Key provisions
- Establishes standards for healthcare services for children and youth in state custody.
- Requires the Department of Youth Services to collaborate with healthcare providers.
- Promotes access to mental health services for this population.
- Supports the development of a comprehensive care plan for each child or youth.
- Addresses gaps in existing healthcare services for youth in foster care.
Who is affected
- Children in state custody
- Youth in state custody
- Department of Youth Services
- Healthcare providers
- Families of children and youth in state custody
Notable changes
- Focuses specifically on children and youth in the Department of Youth Services' care.
- Likely aims to improve coordination between social services and healthcare.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Jacob R. Oliveira
Cosponsors
Jacob R. Oliveira
James B. Eldridge
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours