An Act relative to public employee benefits for military service members on active duty
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve benefits for Massachusetts public employees who are also members of the military serving on active duty. It seeks to ensure that these individuals receive comparable benefits to those offered to other state employees, particularly regarding retirement and healthcare. The bill intends to address potential disparities in benefits based on military service and promote fairness for these dual-service members. It builds upon previous attempts to address similar issues.
Key provisions
- Ensuring comparable retirement benefits for military service members.
- Maintaining healthcare benefits for military service members on active duty.
- Addressing potential disparities in benefits due to military service.
- Providing benefits consistent with those offered to other state employees.
- Reviewing existing policies to ensure alignment with military service needs.
- Clarifying benefit eligibility for military personnel.
- Establishing a process for evaluating and updating benefit provisions.
- Supporting military service members and their families.
Who is affected
- Massachusetts public employees
- Military service members on active duty
- Veterans
- State government
- Families of military service members
Notable changes
- This bill builds upon previous legislation addressing similar issues.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours