Proposal for a legislative amendment to the Constitution to define the succession plan for a vacancy in the office of Lieutenant Governor
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This proposal seeks to amend the Massachusetts Constitution to establish a clear process for determining the order of succession when the Lieutenant Governor’s office becomes vacant. Currently, the specific procedures are not defined in the state constitution, leading to potential uncertainty. This amendment aims to provide a more structured and legally secure succession plan for this important statewide office.
Key provisions
- Establishes a defined order of succession for the Lieutenant Governor's office.
- Specifies the roles and responsibilities of the Governor and the President of the Senate during a vacancy.
- Clarifies the process for filling the vacancy, potentially involving an interim Lieutenant Governor.
- Addresses the potential for a special election to fill the vacancy.
- Ensures continuity of government operations during a vacancy.
Who is affected
- The Governor of Massachusetts
- The Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts
- The President of the Massachusetts Senate
- The citizens of Massachusetts
- The Massachusetts General Court
Notable changes
- Provides a constitutional framework for Lieutenant Governor succession.
- Addresses a gap in existing law regarding the specific procedures for handling vacancies in the office.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours