An Act preventing the discharge of radioactive materials
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to prevent the discharge of radioactive materials, specifically focusing on spent fuel pool water, into Massachusetts waters. It seeks to regulate and potentially restrict the release of this material to protect the environment and public health. The bill was introduced by several representatives and has undergone revisions and hearings as it moves through the legislative process. It is part of a series of related bills addressing water discharge regulations.
Key provisions
- Prohibits the discharge of spent fuel pool water.
- Addresses the release of radioactive materials into Massachusetts waterways.
- Requires regulations to govern the handling and disposal of spent fuel pool water.
- Likely involves establishing standards for radioactive discharge limits.
- May include provisions for monitoring and reporting of discharges.
Who is affected
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Nuclear power plants
- Water utilities
- Massachusetts residents
- Fisheries and aquatic ecosystems
Notable changes
- The bill has been amended and updated multiple times, as evidenced by the reference to H.5148.
- It is part of a series of similar bills addressing water discharge regulations.
- The bill's specific regulations and limitations will be determined through further legislative action and potential rule-making.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
6 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours