An Act clarifying Group 4 retirement classification eligibility for utility maintenance workers
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies the rules for utility maintenance workers to qualify for Group 4 retirement classification in Massachusetts. Currently, the eligibility criteria for this group may be unclear, leading to confusion and potential inequities. The legislation aims to provide a more defined and transparent process for determining eligibility, ensuring fairness and consistency in retirement benefits for these workers. It addresses specific concerns related to the classification of utility maintenance personnel.
Key provisions
- Defines the specific criteria for Group 4 retirement eligibility for utility maintenance workers.
- Clarifies the types of work considered within the ‘utility maintenance’ category.
- Addresses potential inconsistencies in applying existing retirement regulations.
- Establishes a process for reviewing and updating the criteria as needed.
- Ensures that workers meet specific requirements related to years of service and job duties.
Who is affected
- Utility maintenance workers in Massachusetts
- Massachusetts residents who work as utility maintenance personnel
- The Massachusetts Retirement System
Notable changes
- Provides greater clarity regarding the qualifications for Group 4 retirement.
- May standardize the process for determining eligibility across different utility companies.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours