An Act further defining the purposes of the affordable housing trust in the city of Somerville
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies and defines the purposes of the affordable housing trust in Somerville, Massachusetts. It aims to provide greater regulatory oversight of the trust’s operations and activities within the city. The bill was presented by Representative Christine Barber with approval from the mayor and city council, reflecting local support for these changes. The legislation seeks to further establish the trust’s role in promoting affordable housing options.
Key provisions
- Defines the specific purposes of the Somerville Affordable Housing Trust.
- Establishes greater regulatory oversight of the trust’s activities.
- Requires the trust to operate in accordance with city policies and guidelines.
- Clarifies the trust’s authority regarding the allocation of funds.
- Specifies reporting requirements for the trust’s operations.
- Addresses the trust’s role in supporting various affordable housing initiatives.
- Ensures transparency and accountability in the trust’s management.
- Outlines procedures for reviewing and approving affordable housing projects.
Who is affected
- Residents of Somerville
- The Affordable Housing Trust in Somerville
- Developers of affordable housing projects
- City of Somerville government
- Potential beneficiaries of affordable housing
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours