An Act authorizing the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance to grant easements in certain parcels of land to the city of Lowell
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill authorizes the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance to grant easements to the city of Lowell for access to certain parcels of land. It essentially gives the state agency the power to allow the city to use specific land areas, likely for municipal purposes. The bill was amended and referred to multiple committees before being reported favorably.
Key provisions
- The Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance is authorized to grant easements.
- Easements are to be granted to the city of Lowell.
- The authorization applies to ‘certain parcels of land’ (specific parcels are not defined in the bill).
- The bill was subject to amendment and revisions during its consideration.
- It was referred to the committee on House Ways and Means and then the committee on House Steering, Policy and Scheduling.
- The bill was reported favorably by the committee on House Ways and Means.
- The bill was amended and a new draft (H4772) was substituted.
- The bill was considered by the Senate and concurred.
Who is affected
- The Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance
- The city of Lowell
- Property owners of the affected parcels of land
Notable changes
- The bill was amended multiple times during its legislative process.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours