An Act allowing “print-free” digital legal notices for the town of Wellesley
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill allows the town of Wellesley, Massachusetts, to use digital publications instead of traditional printed notices for legal and official announcements. It seeks to reduce costs and improve efficiency in delivering important information to residents. The bill was approved by the town of Wellesley and subsequently passed by the Senate. This legislation is part of a series of similar bills proposing digital legal notices for various Massachusetts towns.
Key provisions
- Authorizes Wellesley to use digital publications for legal notices.
- Allows the town to satisfy legal notice requirements through digital means.
- The bill was approved by the town of Wellesley.
- This legislation is part of a broader effort to implement digital legal notices in Massachusetts.
- The bill was concurred by the Senate.
Who is affected
- Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts
- Residents of Wellesley
- Municipalities in Massachusetts
- Legal professionals in Wellesley
- Government officials in Wellesley
Notable changes
- Shifts from traditional printed notices to digital publications for legal announcements.
- Represents a potential cost-saving measure for the town of Wellesley.
- Aligns with a broader trend of municipalities adopting digital communication methods.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Alice Hanlon Peisch
Cosponsors
Alice Hanlon Peisch
Cynthia Stone Creem
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours