An Act relative to the inclusion of commercial fishermen as a designated vocation for affordable and attainable housing preference in the town of Chatham under Section 32, Seasonal Communities, Subsection (d), of the Affordable Homes Act
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill seeks to establish a housing preference for commercial fishermen in Chatham, Massachusetts, under the Affordable Homes Act. Specifically, it aims to incorporate the designation of ‘designated vocation’ for fishermen within Section 32, Seasonal Communities, Subsection (d) of the Act. This would allow fishermen to potentially receive priority in accessing affordable and attainable housing within the town.
Key provisions
- Designates commercial fishermen as a ‘designated vocation’ for housing preference.
- Applies this preference under Section 32, Seasonal Communities, Subsection (d) of the Affordable Homes Act.
- Focuses on the town of Chatham, Massachusetts.
- Relies on local approval from the town of Chatham.
- Aims to address housing needs for the local fishing industry.
Who is affected
- Commercial fishermen
- Residents of Chatham, Massachusetts
- Housing developers in Chatham
- The Affordable Homes Act
- Local government in Chatham
Notable changes
- Introduces a specific vocational designation for housing preference.
- Targets a particular town (Chatham) within Massachusetts.
- Relies on existing provisions of the Affordable Homes Act.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours