An Act to protect Massachusetts public health from PFAS
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to protect the public health of Massachusetts residents by addressing the risks associated with Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It seeks to establish regulations and guidelines concerning the use, monitoring, and remediation of PFAS chemicals, which are prevalent in consumer products and industrial processes. The bill’s specific details are still being developed as it is currently referred to the Senate Ways and Means committee.
Key provisions
- Requires the Department of Public Health to develop guidelines for PFAS monitoring.
- Establishes reporting requirements for entities that use or release PFAS.
- Authorizes the remediation of PFAS contamination in public water supplies.
- Creates a fund for PFAS remediation projects.
- Addresses PFAS in firefighting foam.
- Requires labeling of products containing PFAS.
- Expands the definition of PFAS to include related compounds.
- Allows for the establishment of PFAS cleanup sites.
Who is affected
- Massachusetts residents
- Businesses that use or produce PFAS
- Environmental agencies
- Public water suppliers
- The Department of Public Health
Notable changes
- The bill introduces regulations specifically targeting PFAS chemicals.
- It establishes a framework for monitoring and remediation efforts.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
31 on record
Primary sponsor
Joint Committee on Public Health
Cosponsors
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours