An Act relative to violation of regulation regarding hot work processes
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This amendment to regulations concerning hot work processes aims to clarify and strengthen enforcement related to safety requirements. Specifically, it addresses potential violations and establishes a more consistent approach to inspections and penalties. The amendment seeks to improve worker safety by ensuring compliance with existing regulations for activities involving heat and fire hazards. It updates existing rules to better reflect current best practices and industry standards.
Key provisions
- Clarifies the definition of ‘hot work’ to encompass a broader range of activities.
- Requires more frequent inspections of workplaces conducting hot work.
- Establishes specific procedures for documenting and reporting hot work violations.
- Defines penalties for non-compliance with hot work regulations.
- Specifies requirements for worker training and certification related to hot work.
- Mandates the use of written hot work permits in certain situations.
- Updates requirements for fire watch personnel during hot work operations.
- Addresses the proper storage and handling of flammable materials used in hot work.
Who is affected
- Construction workers
- Industrial workers
- Businesses performing hot work
- Fire safety inspectors
- The Department of Labor and Industries
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
House Committee on Ways and Means
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours