An Act amending the act of June 22, 1937 (P.L.1987, No.394), known as The Clean Streams Law, in other pollutions and potential pollution, further providing for potential pollution.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill amends Pennsylvania’s Clean Streams Law to address ‘potential pollution,’ specifically expanding the scope of requirements for construction sites. It allows construction sites disturbing one to two acres to apply for a waiver from a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under certain conditions. The bill aims to regulate pollution beyond traditional discharges and considers potential environmental impacts.
Key provisions
- Allows construction sites disturbing one to two acres to apply for a NPDES permit waiver.
- Addresses ‘potential pollution’ as a new area of concern under the Clean Streams Law.
- References 40 CFR 122.26(b)(15)(i) for the waiver process.
- Expands the Clean Streams Law to cover a broader range of pollution sources.
- Specifically targets land disturbance of one to two acres.
- Provides a mechanism for applying for a waiver related to storm water discharges.
Who is affected
- Construction companies
- Land developers
- Pennsylvania residents
- Environmental regulators
- Landowners
Notable changes
- Introduces the concept of ‘potential pollution’ as a regulated area.
- Creates a specific pathway for construction sites to potentially avoid NPDES permit requirements.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Pn 1579 Html
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
9 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Daniel Laughlin
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours