rural groundwater management areas; establishment
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill establishes a process for managing groundwater in rural areas of Arizona. It requires that subdivisions outside of active management areas demonstrate an adequate water supply before receiving approval for development, and it introduces exemptions for subdivisions relying on water transported by vehicle or train. The bill also amends existing laws to clarify the commissioner's role in reviewing subdivision plans and ensuring compliance with water regulations, particularly in rural areas.
Key provisions
- Requires subdivisions outside active management areas to demonstrate an adequate water supply before approval.
- Establishes exemptions for subdivisions relying on water transported by vehicle or train.
- Modifies section 11-823 to address water supply adequacy for subdivisions.
- Amends section 32-2181 to require more detailed notifications to the commissioner regarding subdivision plans.
- Updates section 32-2183 to clarify the commissioner's authority to deny public reports and investigate potential violations.
- Introduces a process for issuing amended public reports for subdivisions.
- Creates a system for rural groundwater management area councils to establish mandatory adequacy requirements.
- Specifies requirements for disclosures to prospective buyers regarding water supply and potential fees.
Who is affected
- Developers of subdivisions
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours