juvenile; natural life; parole eligibility
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill amends Arizona law to change the rules for parole eligibility for juvenile offenders sentenced to life or lengthy prison terms. Specifically, it makes eligible for parole those sentenced to natural life or at least 25 or 35 years, regardless of when the offense was committed, and establishes a minimum parole eligibility period. It also modifies sentencing guidelines for juvenile offenders convicted of violent sexual assault and terrorism, impacting potential prison terms and eligibility for parole.
Key provisions
- Juveniles sentenced to natural life or at least 25 years for offenses before age 18 are now eligible for parole upon serving a minimum period.
- Juveniles sentenced to at least 35 years are eligible for parole after serving 35 years.
- Sentencing guidelines for violent sexual assault offenses are updated, potentially increasing prison terms for offenders over 18.
- Sentencing guidelines for terrorism offenses are updated, potentially increasing prison terms for offenders over 18.
- Retroactive application to prior convictions for offenses committed before age 18.
- Establishes a 35-year maximum sentence for juvenile offenders.
- Clarifies the definition of ‘serious offense’ for purposes of sentencing.
- Addresses the rights of victims in sentencing proceedings.
Who is affected
- Juveniles
- Adults convicted of crimes before age 18
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours