An Act to improve outdoor lighting, conserve energy, and increase dark-sky visibility
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve outdoor lighting practices in Massachusetts to conserve energy and protect the state’s dark skies. It proposes changes to outdoor lighting standards to reduce light pollution and encourage the use of more efficient and shielded lighting fixtures. The goal is to balance public safety with environmental considerations and enhance the visibility of the night sky.
Key provisions
- Requires the use of shielded outdoor lighting fixtures to direct light downwards.
- Promotes the adoption of energy-efficient outdoor lighting technologies.
- Establishes guidelines for the reduction of light trespass.
- Encourages the use of lower color temperatures for outdoor lighting.
- Directs the Department of Energy to develop recommendations for outdoor lighting standards.
- Addresses the impact of outdoor lighting on wildlife.
Who is affected
- Municipalities
- Property owners
- Lighting fixture manufacturers
- Residents of Massachusetts
- Wildlife
Notable changes
- The bill substitutes a new draft for Senate Bill 2243.
- It focuses on reducing light pollution and promoting energy efficiency in outdoor lighting.
- The bill was amended to include specific recommendations from the Senate Ways and Means Committee.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
7 on record
Primary sponsor
Senate Committee on Ways and Means
Cosponsors
Cynthia Stone Creem
James B. Eldridge
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours