SB 663
Allowing parents to refuse family court-ordered medical procedure of child against parents' wishes
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take action- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House of Delegates
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes West Virginia law to prevent family court judges from ordering medical procedures or treatments for a child if a parent objects. Currently, judges have broad authority to order medical care, but this legislation aims to give parents more say in their child’s healthcare decisions. It specifically addresses situations where a parent objects to a recommended medical procedure. The bill focuses on protecting parental rights regarding their child’s medical care.
Key provisions
- Family court judges cannot order medical procedures for a child without parental consent.
- This applies specifically to objections raised by a parent.
- The bill addresses the issue of medical neglect, excluding it from the restriction.
- It clarifies the role of the Supreme Court of Appeals in establishing administrative rules for family courts.
- The Supreme Court of Appeals will report on family court caseloads and recommend improvements.
- A procedural rule will be established for time-keeping to maximize funding for case processing.
- Local administrative rules are subordinate to state and Supreme Court rules.
Who is affected
- Parents of children in West Virginia family court.
- Family court judges in West Virginia.
- Children involved in West Virginia family court proceedings.
- Legal professionals involved in family court cases.
Notable changes
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours