Denouncing Sharia law in the United States.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This concurrent resolution expresses concern regarding the implementation of Sharia law in the United States. It argues that Sharia law, derived from Islamic texts and jurisprudence, presents a threat to American values, constitutional principles, and individual liberties due to its potential to establish legal distinctions, restrict rights, and discriminate against certain groups. The resolution specifically highlights concerns about practices like unequal treatment of women, restrictions on religious freedom, and the potential for violence against non-Muslims and dissidents.
Key provisions
- Denounces Sharia law in all forms.
- States that Sharia law is incompatible with the United States Constitution and democratic principles.
- Highlights concerns about Sharia’s impact on women’s rights, including unequal treatment and restrictions on autonomy.
- Expresses concern over potential restrictions on religious freedom and free speech.
- Points to the potential for discrimination against non-Muslims and dissidents.
- References historical instances of conflict related to Islamic law.
- Acknowledges concerns about practices like female genital mutilation.
- States that Sharia law operates as a political system in certain countries.
Who is affected
- Muslims (specifically those advocating for or implementing Sharia law)
- Women
- Non-Muslims
- Dissidents
- The United States
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours