Requires State superintendent of NJ Office of Weights and Measures to inspect baggage scales at certain airports within State.
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed General Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill directs the New Jersey State superintendent of the Office of Weights and Measures to regularly inspect baggage scales at specific airports located within the state. The goal is to ensure these scales are accurate and reliable, protecting travelers from potential discrepancies in weight measurements. This inspection process will help maintain consumer confidence and prevent issues related to baggage fees or transportation problems. The bill aims to standardize and improve the quality control of baggage scale operations at these airports.
Key provisions
- The State superintendent of the Office of Weights and Measures will conduct inspections.
- Inspections will focus on baggage scales at designated airports in New Jersey.
- The superintendent will establish inspection procedures and standards.
- The bill mandates regular inspections to ensure accuracy.
Who is affected
- Travelers using airports in New Jersey
- Airports in New Jersey
- The New Jersey Office of Weights and Measures
- Baggage handlers at airports
Notable changes
- Currently, the frequency and scope of baggage scale inspections at New Jersey airports are not explicitly defined.
- This bill introduces a formalized inspection process overseen by the State Office of Weights and Measures.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours