119th Congress (2025-2026)

HR 29

Laken Riley Act

Passed Origin Chamber

Jurisdiction

US Congress

Session

119th Congress (2025-2026)

Official source

Chamber

House

Session

119th Congress (2025-2026)

Jurisdiction

US Congress

Bill overview

The Laken Riley Act aims to increase the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) ability to detain non-U.S. nationals who have been arrested for theft-related crimes. It allows states to sue the federal government if DHS releases individuals suspected of such crimes, and it establishes a process for states to seek injunctive relief related to immigration enforcement decisions. The bill also includes provisions related to visa issuance and parole requirements, allowing states to sue over violations that cause financial harm.

Key provisions

Requires DHS to detain non-U.S. nationals charged with burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.
Authorizes states to sue DHS for releasing individuals suspected of theft-related crimes.
Establishes a process for states to sue the federal government over immigration enforcement decisions.
Addresses visa issuance and parole requirements, allowing states to challenge violations.
Defines ‘burglary,’ ‘theft,’ ‘larceny,’ and ‘shoplifting’ based on the jurisdiction where the crimes occurred.
Grants attorneys general of states standing to sue DHS regarding immigration-related actions.
Sets a financial threshold ($100) for states to demonstrate harm in lawsuits.
Specifies that certain actions, such as state lawsuits, are exempt from a limitation on injunctive relief.

Who is affected

U.S. Citizens
Non-U.S. Nationals
Department of Homeland Security
State Attorneys General
Immigration Enforcement Agencies

Positions across the country

No public positions recorded for this legislation.

Arguments in favor

Reasons to support this legislation.

No arguments in favor have been submitted.

Submit yours

Arguments opposed

Reasons to oppose this legislation.

No arguments opposed have been submitted.

Submit yours

Legislative history

2025-01-03House

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

2025-01-03

Introduced in House

2025-01-03

Introduced in House

2025-01-07House

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Vote map

US House by district

Loading map data

Updating map data

0 districts with vote data

Nay

Yea

Floor votes and chamber actions

Recorded roll calls list how each member voted. Unanimous consent or voice vote appears in the official action history without a roll call; no member-level tally is available for those steps.

Recorded roll calls

Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.

Jan 3, 2025XMLView source

119th CONGRESS — 1st Session

H. R. 29

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes.

1.Short title

This Act may be cited as the

Laken Riley Act

2.Detention of certain aliens who commit theft

Section 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226(c)) is amended—

(1)

in paragraph (1)—

(A)in subparagraph (C), by striking or;

(B)

in subparagraph (D), by striking the comma at the end and inserting , or; and

(C)

by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:

(E)

(i)is inadmissible under paragraph (6)(A), (6)(C), or (7) of section 212(a), and

(ii)

is charged with, is arrested for, is convicted of, admits having committed, or admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of any burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offense,

;

(2)

by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4); and

(3)

by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:

(2)Definition

For purposes of paragraph (1)(E), the terms burglary, theft, larceny, and shoplifting have the meaning given such terms in the jurisdiction where the acts occurred.

(3)Detainer

The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue a detainer for an alien described in paragraph (1)(E) and, if the alien is not otherwise detained by Federal, State, or local officials, shall effectively and expeditiously take custody of the alien.

3.Enforcement by attorney general of a State

(a)Inspection of applicants for admissionSection 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)) is amended—

(1)

by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and

(2)

by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:

(3)Enforcement by attorney general of a StateThe attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention and removal requirements under paragraphs (1) or (2) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this paragraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this paragraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.

(b)Apprehension and detention of aliensSection 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226), as amended by this Act, is further amended—

(1)

in subsection (e)—

(A)

by striking or release; and

(B)

by striking grant, revocation, or denial and insert revocation or denial; and

(2)

by adding at the end the following:

(f)Enforcement by attorney general of a StateThe attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging an action or decision by the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security under this section to release any alien or grant bond or parole to any alien that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subsection to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.

(c)PenaltiesSection 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1253) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(e)Enforcement by attorney general of a StateThe attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the requirement to discontinue granting visas to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents as described in subsection (d) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of State on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subsection to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.

(d)Certain classes of aliensSection 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is amended—

(1)

by striking Attorney General each place it appears and inserting Secretary of Homeland Security; and

(2)

by adding at the end the following:

(C)The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the limitation under subparagraph (A) that parole solely be granted on a case-by-case basis and solely for urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit, that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subparagraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subparagraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.

(e)DetentionSection 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(2)) is amended—

(1)by striking During the removal period, and inserting the following:

(A)In generalDuring the removal period,

; and

(2)

by adding at the end the following:

(B)Enforcement by attorney general of a StateThe attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention requirement under subparagraph (A) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subparagraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subparagraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.

(f)Limit on injunctive reliefSection 242(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252(f)) is amended by adding at the end following:

(3)Certain actionsParagraph (1) shall not apply to an action brought pursuant to section 235(b)(3), subsections (e) or (f) of section 236, or section 241(a)(2)(B).

HR 29