Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill, the Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act, requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct annual assessments of the threat posed by the use of generative artificial intelligence by terrorist organizations. These assessments will analyze incidents where generative AI has been used to spread extremist messaging or develop weapons, and will recommend counter-terrorism measures. The assessments will be shared with Congress and the public, with classified information provided in an annex.
Key provisions
- Requires annual assessments of terrorism threats from generative AI.
- Directs the Secretary to consult with the Director of National Intelligence.
- Focuses assessments on incidents of AI use in spreading extremist messaging and developing weapons.
- Mandates public release of unclassified assessment findings.
- Requires the Secretary to coordinate with fusion centers and the National Network of Fusion Centers.
- Establishes a process for briefing Congress on the assessments.
- Defines key terms related to artificial intelligence and terrorism.
- Specifies the congressional committees responsible for reviewing the assessments.
Who is affected
- Department of Homeland Security
- Intelligence Community
- Foreign Terrorist Organizations
- State and Local Law Enforcement (through fusion centers)
- The general public
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours